Friday, May 20, 2011

final assignment


                                                            Final Assignment

            Throughout the course of the semester, we have read 10 books, all written by women.  Coming into this class, I did not know what to expect.  Truthfully, I chose this class just to fill English requirement credits, and thought that the books in a women’s literature course would be torture for any male who is forced to read them. However, my experience in this class far exceeded the skepticism I had coming into the class.  The books were not the female supremacist guidelines that I expected them to be, and, honestly, they were very interesting for the most part.
            I think that this course helped me understand women’s thought processes better, since the books that we read were either about real life experiences they went through, or, a fictional generalization of what women may experience, and how they react to it.  I have learned that women put more emphasis on certain experiences that tend to stick with them throughout their lives.  I have also inferred that these events mold a woman’s personality much more than it would have done to a man, potentially due to the maternal instincts of women. 
            One theme that has reoccurred throughout novels this semester was childhood.  It seems that early childhood and adolescence have been the most pivotal points in the lives of the women we have read about.  For example, in Fun Home, by Alison Bechdel, Alison portrayed important parts of her childhood that would affect her for the remainder of her life.  Her family was very dysfunctional, and her father always seemed to be more interested in the restoration of their home than his own children.  Her father also took on most of the responsibilities that the matriarch is traditionally in charge of.  This was definitely a factor in Alison becoming a lesbian.  The gender role of her father caused her identity with herself to be questioned, as her father tried to make her as feminine as possible.  This gave Alison a false sense of gender identity, only to later find out that her father has secretly had homosexual affairs both in the military and with his high school students.  This is just one example of how a childhood with untraditional circumstances can lead to a permanent lifestyle in the books we have read.  Another example of a distraught childhood affecting a character was in Push.  Precious grew up in a broken home, where her mother verbally abused her, and when her father showed up, it was usually to molest Precious.  Obviously, something so grave would affect anyone in that circumstance.  However, many other things led to Precious’ troubled lifestlye.  She grew up being looked at as an insignificant troublemaker by people who had no idea what she had went through.  She gave birth to her first child, a product of her father, who had been born with a mental disease.  She went on to name him, “Lil Mongo.”  This is evidence that her troubled childhood had eliminated any amount of self-worth that she had.  She remained troubled, and supposedly worthless, until she met Ms. Rain, who was the first person who truly wanted to help her, and intervened on her own.  She eventually got precious to open up to her, and Precious would begin her journey to being a more confident, valuable woman.  When Precious gave birth to her second child, she was old enough, and mature enough, to understand what being a mother really meant.  She gave her child a real name, and the author left the reader with a sense that she would go on to give him the childhood that Precious could never experience.
            A final theme that seemed to be evident in many of the books we read was sexuality.  This was an aspect of almost all of the books we have read, and many of the times, it was tied into the character’s childhood, such as in, Fun Home, and, Push.  Not all of them, however, are a result of a troubled childhood.  In, The Vagina Monologues, by Eve Ensler, an incredible amount of emotion is portrayed through her fictional monologues.  She “asks her interviewee,” to ask what their vagina would wear if it had to wear clothes.  The answers ranged from dirty, ripped jeans to pink boas. Since Ensler is a woman, I think that the fact that her book has been so critically acclaimed proves that she is just one of woman out of the entire population who has a strong, both physical and emotional relationship with her vagina. 
A Second theme portrayed by novels we have read this semester is motherhood, or lack thereof.  Motherhood is important to both the child and the mother.  In many cases, a child who grows up without the traditional mother figure can be vulnerable to many mental and physical problems.  However, the act of being a mother is equally important.  In, The Shawl, Rosa is faced with the option of attempting to save her daughter from being killed by a Nazi.  She opts to not save her daughter, and is forever haunted of robbing her child of a childhood, and herself of motherhood.  Being alive after watching the death of her daughter made Rosa feel as though she were living only because of Magda’s sacrifice.  I think that this shows how important being a mother and caring for a child is to any woman, whether they have already had children or not.
Throughout this women’s literature class, I have read books that have opened me up to a new set of theories and emotions.  Some of the reoccurring themes we have read about include childhood sexual identity, and motherhood.  All of these, in my opinion, are looked at in a different light by women than it would have been from a man’s point of view.  Overall, I think these novels tried to expose those differences, and bring many things that are often concealed, and seldom spoken of, into the light of the public to provide knowledge to those who are ignorant, or misinformed, about the troubles and triumphs of being, and becoming, a woman.

Friday, May 6, 2011

2 or 3 things i know for sure

In, 2 or 3 Things I know for Sure, by Dorothy Allison, pictures are sporadically posted in the novel to give the reader a sense of what Allison's life was truly like.  I think that the pictures do a good job in keep the reader entertained, and willing to read more than it would if this biography did not have these pictures in it. The pictures all may seem to be just another average photograph that would be found laying around the house, but all of them seem to have an underlying message that Allison can connect to very strongly.  Also, by looking at the photos, as the story progresses, you can tell when Allison's life started to change for the worse.  I think that this is not laziness of the author, and not just a way to show off her photographs from her childhood to the readers, but rather a way of enhancing the reader's experience by adding another form of media into the novel.  A picture is worth 1000 words, and Allison admits to this on page 39, when it reads, "Behind each story I tell is the one I don't."  This simply reinforces the idea that she uses multimedia to support the memoirs that she wants the reader to see as vividly as possible.  I think that this book has a similar feel to that of Fun Home, because of the way she not only writes, but shows the reader about her struggles and hardships of her life at home.  I enjoy this, as not only does it make it an easier read, but it truly gives the reader a sense of who was truly in her life, and what they looked like.

Monday, May 2, 2011

the shawl

Over the course of the semester, we have read a number of novels in which one of the main topics has been the role of motherhood affects both the mother and the child.  I think that for every woman, being a mother is a natural necessity, and not just a social standard.  When Magda is killed in the concentration camp, Rosa   is robbed of something that every woman should be entitled to.  Her choice that she chose not to try to save Magda sticks with her, and becomes, what I think, the internal reasoning behind Rosa's supposed craziness.  The fact that she uses Stella as a scapegoat prolongs her eventual mental meltdown.  I think that she is permanently stripped of any sense of fulfillment, as the Nazi forces who she had no control over took her only child.  I think that Rosa doesn't know whether to blame herself or Stella for what happened, and that forced her to live with the insecurity of potentially never being a mother again.  I also believe that even if she were to have another child, it would just be a constant reminder of the horrible, traumatic events that she experienced.  This truly would mitigate her survival of the holocaust, knowing that a huge part of her has been taken, and can never return.  The fact that she can't do anything to save Magda, or replace her, makes her feel insecure that her life is even worth living.  I think that having faced such a crossroads in her life, in such an extreme circumstance, the scars left on Rosa had made the pain nearly insurmountable, thus mitigating her survival of a massive genocide.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

the shawl

In, The Shawl, by Cynthia Ozick, the readers may ask themselves multiple times throughout the novel, "Is Rosa crazy?"  Rosa, obviously traumatized by the horrific acts of genocide that she witnessed with Magda and Stella, does things throughout the novel that may jeopardize her sanity.  All things considered, however, what Rosa had lived through was enough to make anyone go insane. After witnessing the murder of her small child, Rosa is forever alone, with just Stella to look back on the events which took place during the Holocaust.  However, Rosa has held a grudge with Stella since the incident where she took the shawl, leaving Magda exposed, which would eventually lead to her demise.  Once leaving the concentration camps and arriving in New York, Rosa had established a humble antique shop.  I think that it took Rosa a while to feel that she did not deserve the life she was living because she was in denial that she could have done anything to save Magda.  I personally do not think that there was anything she could have done, but I do think that Rosa does, and that is why she has held such a grudge with Stella.  Rosa uses Stella as a scapegoat for her taking the shawl, because she feels that she is as responsible for Magda's death as Stella is.  After keeping all of this bottled up for years, she eventually snapped and destroyed the antique shop that she once created.  I think that Rosa confines herself to a disheveled Miami hotel to live a lifestyle that she thought was more deserving for her, after "taking the life" of her daughter.  I do not think that Rosa is genuinely crazy, however.  Before the concentration camp, Rosa was an ordinary girl, who has not been exposed to such traumatic events.  After all that she experienced, however, in my opinion, she had not become crazy, yet she had been institutionalized, the same way that someone would be after going to prison for years.  I think that that is why she moved to such a terrible place, to replicate where she thought she deserved to be.  Having said that, I do not think that Rosa is crazy, however, I do not think this is a success story.  I think that the oppression from the Nazi's clearly outweigh any form of success she may have had, whether she would ever live a normal life again or not.  



Sunday, April 24, 2011

emperor 3


I think that Otsuka wrote about the topic of Japanese internment camps mainly for one obvious reason; to bring something that is seldom spoken about to light.  I also think that it was for her own knowledge of the situation, as she learned little about it while growing up.  I think that this book took a more, “under the radar,” approach to discussing something that is rarely touched upon, than a novel such as, The Vagina Monologues.  Although one novel is about a topic that is obviously much more solemn than the one discussed by Eve Ensler, Otsuka’s mission was similar.  This novel, in my opinion, relates to the events that happened on 9/11, as well as any national tragedy or corruption, as it will rarely be seen being discussed, and affected thousands of families for generations to come.  The families who have been affected would have to keep to themselves, when provided little to no outlets to express how they feel about it, or to hear someone else's perspective of the event.  I think that is also a reason why the family members are unnamed throughout the book.  Otsuka seemed to have been writing this novel for any and everyone who has experienced any type of this trauma.  The nameless family, in my opinion, is to represent all of the families who can relate, in any way.  I also think that this is why so much is left unsaid, or said in a monotonous tone throughout the novel; so that the reader can relate to the family in their own way, whether having gone through such a circumstance or not.  When the Emporer Was Divine, is a novel written about a little-known topic.  The author had little knowledge of the events growing up, but later learned the harsh realities of the internment camps, and shared her knowledge with the world to shine light on it.




emperor 2


Otsuka’s style, throughout, When the Emperor Was Divine, may strike people as a minimalist approach to the topic at hand, and I do agree.  I think that for such a topic, which is clearly such an emotional nightmare for any family, Otsuka tried to leave out a lot of the blatantly overwhelming emotional dialogues to let the reader read between the lines, and try to force them to imagine how it would be in such a situation.  I think that after reading Push, which is clearly a much more disturbing novel on the surface, When the Emperor Was Divine, was much harder to get the full experience from the novel that the author desired.  I think that it could have been a better read if not read so soon after Push.  I think the monotonous tone is not so much an example of a minimalist approach, but rather a way of showing the reader how the family tried to maintain optimistic while in an obviously excruciating circumstance.  I think that most families would react this way, as to not discourage the others, and simply act level-headed.  I think that her tone can be considered minimalist throughout the novel, yet I think that it plays a bigger role in letting the reader connect on their own, instead of being thrown into a situation that few people are well-informed about, if familiar with the internment camps at all.

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Divine emporer 1

When The Emporer was Divine, is a story that is a clear contrast of most peoples' idea of the, "American Dream."  Immigrants from all over the world thought that they would be coming to America to be in the center of the world's most lucrative melting pot.  I do not think that anyone who came to America in hopes to find the "American Dream," would imagine that their family would be harassed and dismantled due to their race.  When people imagine America upon immigration, they would generally think that they would be living lavishly, will little to worry about, and many goods and luxuries that they would become accustomed to living with.  It is hard to fathom that someone would associate the "roads paved with gold," with being taken away from their home, separated from their patriarch, and told that they are only allowed to bring one suitcase full of belongings, not to mention that all of the items be recorded on a list.  The killing of the family's pet dog, which is now not only illegal, but incredibly immoral, seemed almost sacrificial, as it was provoked by the family's background.  To the family, America had not at all been what they have expected or dreamt of.  They thought they would remain a sound, happy family, and not have letters from the father figure being labeled, "detained alien enemy mail."  

Sunday, April 10, 2011

push 4/10 post

Precious, in Push, is faced with a tremendous amount of despairity and baggage, and, in the end, finds some light at the end of the tunnel.  Some may see it as an example of the, "American Dream," however, I think that it is a contradiction of the American dream and more of a story of despair.  Although Precious eventually showed progression in the quality of her life, even while battling a terminal disease, it is absurd to inquire that Precious' situation is anyone's idea of the American dream.  Although, I do think that Precious' personal gain did benefit from the fact that she was in America.  Precious utilized her resources by visiting a number of clinics and help groups to help her better understand her situation, and get more educated about her lifestyle, and life in general.  I think that the story is essentially a depiction of both hope and disparity, as Precious seemed as if she had nothing to live for, but managed to make the most of her situation, and realize her own value, and have a sense of fulfillment from conceiving her second baby born out of incest.  However, I do not think that her situation is simple enough to state whether it is a story of hope or despair.  The life that she was born into was obviously something that was not only illegal, but is the epitome of a bad upbringing.  Ultimately, Precious comes from a nasty environment and abusive home and learns to use the resources that are available to her to overcome the trauma of the way she was raised.  I think that this can be labeled as nothing but a personal success story, being that Precious was in such a broken home, and eventually learned how to make the most of the tiny bit that was given to her.

Late entry for thursday 4/7

I think that Push portrays the life of a female, in one specific situation, and how it affects her life and the way she views herself.  I think that Sapphire is doing this to say much more, however.  I think that the novel is her way of letting the world know that there are horrible places, with horrible things going on, and it is not just Precious.  I think that the way that people relate to this book is much different, and more extreme than just about any other book.  The type of experiences that Precious went through may not be the same as everybody who reads it, but people who have experienced trauma from their environment growing up can relate, no matter the location of their home.  Power, abuse, and survival are prevalent throughout the book, and I think that Sapphire did not write this book after anyone in particular, rather just an image of anyone who has been oppressed by their environment, and how it takes a toll on their lives.  Precious' mother did nothing to protect her from the crude environment that she brought her daughter into.  Although she seemed to truly care about her at times, she did nothing to intervene the trifled life of Precious.  The abuse from her father clearly took it's toll on her self-esteem and self image, and the gritty environment she was in, along with her financial and social situation, made Precious' life a very dangerous one, that would eventually kill her.  Sapphire uses all of these as an example of the severity of many lives in many nooks of the world.



Sunday, April 3, 2011

fun home 3


Writing, for many authors and artists, is an outlet of self-expression to help cope with whatever they may have faced throughout their lives, or simply to express how they feel.  Alison Bechdel and Eve Ensler both use their writing to get their words and feelings out in a way that it otherwise wouldn’t.  Bechdel, in Fun Home uses pictures and writing to depict and exemplify her life.  She uses satire and dark humor to give the reader a sense of the lives of a family who play a non-traditional role, although it may not seem that way from the outside.I think that she uses her comic tone to, in a sense, poke fun, at her father’s role and the effect that it had on her childhood and throughout life.  Bechdel’s ability to look at a subject that is rarely touched on or brought to public attention in such a comedic and satirical tone clearly shows that it is truly an outlet for her, as well as Eve Ensler.  Ensler also used subjects that have been essentially kept away from the public in order to express something that she felt passionately about. Both authors use tones, that to me, almost gave me the feeling that they have a secret that they have been to keep, but are trying to tell the general public.  I think that this is caused by the fact that both authors use subjects, which, perhaps because of my gender, are so seldom discussed in such a manner.  I think that it is good that there are women who are willing to express their emotions and stories with an open audience.  I believe that it is good to hear a female’s point of view on subjects that often kept disclosed.  Both authors use the art of literature to express the things that are kept close to themselves, and far from everyday conversation.

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Fun Home #2

Bechdel uses many pictures to depict the minimal text in her story, Fun Home.  I think that the most blatant purpose of her pictures is to show the facial expressions of the characters.  I think that without the pictures, the story would not have the same feel, and the reader would not get the same understanding of the family as they do with the pictures.  Smiles are few and far between in the pictures, and most of the time it shows nothing but solemn and stern faces.  Also, I think that the details of the faces often show that the characters are thinking to themselves.  Bechdel does this to give the reader the feeling that the family is distant, and rarely express their emotions with each other.  Sometimes, she incorporates the characters thoughts in the pictures to show just what they were thinking.  I think that Bechdel uses shading mainly to show character's emotions in the background.  She uses darker colored clothing and shading on the characters who may not be the emphasis of the picture, but whose emotions are important to the reader's understanding of the story.  I also think that there are a number of things pointed out by the lighting of the story, such as objects or events that reinforce what the text is saying.  The tidiness of the house is often exhibited, as is the perceieved, "traditionalistic" functioning of the family.  I think Bechdel also uses silhouettes to describe peoples' emotions without even showing their faces.  Bechdel does a tremendous job with complimenting her text with sketches that truly capture the emotions and thoughts of the characters in the story.

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Fun Home

  Right off the bat, the reader can tell that Fun Home, by Alison Bechdel is different than most any book that they have ever read, and looked at, before.  In the first chapter, it is clear that the father is the voice of the household in the story, although he does not take on the traditional male roles.  He was a clean freak, and it seems he took more pride in his house and what it was furnished with than his children and what they had accomplished.  The mother seems to have a limited role early on in this story, and I think that this will greatly affect all of the children's personality in this book.  It also briefly touches on a deep, dark secret that the father has.  In one scene, while the family is in a church, the text reads, "But would an ideal husband and father have sex with teenage boys?" as the father is looking at the young boys in church.  I think that this is symbolic because they are in church, which shows that the father must not have any regard for standards and morals, and truly does have a deep, dark secret.  I do not think that this secret was well hidden, however, as his children have little connection to him despite the tasks that he makes them do in order to keep his house perfect. One part of the story describes a scene where one of the children is forced to kiss their father goodnight, and can only seem to muster an awkward kiss on the knuckles, that was followed by running out of the room in an awkward situation.  The father seemed to never even be there at all, even when he was there.  The children seem to have a poor relationship with him, and I think that it will affect their personalities for the rest of the story.

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Timeline of Minerva

1938 - Minerva goes to school.

- Minerva eventually meets Lena, a girl who has been taken in as a mistress by the Trujillo.  She tells Minerva that she is mistreated, and that the Trujillo is corrupt and devestating.  This startles Minerva, and makes her want to do something.

-Minerva starts to attend secret, anti - government meeting behind the backs of her parents.

1949- Minerva meets Lio, and starts to spend time with him

- Finds out that her father has been holding on to notes that Lio had been writing her.

- Goes to the Trujillo discovery dance, and slaps the dictator.

- Her father goes to jail

- Minerva is allowed to go to college to study law

1957 - Minerva graduates from college, but is prohibited from practicing law by the Trujillo

- Gets married to Manolo, and they begin to become revolutionaries.

-They are taken to jail in 1959, and get out on house arrest in 1960

- Refuses to accept her pardon, and is later released

- Gets killed visiting husband in jail, trying to get him out

Monday, March 14, 2011

Blog for 3/14 Q#7

I think that Alvarez is trying to accomplish a sense of true sacrifice in the best interest of one's country, as well as the people who live in it.  She uses a true story, and fictionalizes it, in order to give the reader a sense of just how brave and righteous these girls were.  Once Minerva finds out about her friend Lina, and what the Trujillo had done to her, she immediately wants to take action.  This shows that she has an extreme sense of empathy for her country, as well as her friend, once she saw the true power that the Trujillo possessed, and that empathy made her take action against them.  I think that Alvarez is trying to say that the truth must always be revealed for someone to be true with themselves.  I think that this is made evident on the pilgrimage, where Chea finds out that she has been cheated on.  I think that this exemplifies Alvarez's theme of truth to ones' self, because they go on the pilgrimage to find themselves again, because it felt like all faith was being lost between the family.  This also exemplifies Alvarez's theme of search for self.  I think that by this she is saying although she found out something negative in her life, the important part was that she looked for thr truth, and got it; so she does not have to live in ignorance, as most of their country is under the rule of the Trujillo.  I think that the justice theme is the most evident, as it also ties into the roles of women throughout the book.  These young women spend their lives trying to justify themselves as women, and Dominican citizens with rights, and hearts.  All of the women in the novel, at one point or another, step out of their "role in society" to make a statement and benefit their country.




blog for 3/10

I think that Julia Alvarez, in part I of, In the Time of Butterflies, is trying to provoke a sense of good vs. evil, in nearly all of the characters.  Each member of the family is religious, but most have already questions their own faith at one point or another.  Minerva experienced, second-hand, the power and corruption in the Trujillo regime from her friend Lina being  taken as a mistress, and knows that she will have to take action at one point or another, whether it will be a faithful one or not.  Patria also questions her own faith as she had always been one of the more religious people in the family, but finds what she thinks is love while washing a mans' feet, Pedrito Gonzales.  She gives herself up to him, and eventually has children.  As both her and Minerva seem to be losing some of their faith, her third child is a miscarriage, and is born dead.  This petrifies Patria, and she seemed to have lost all of her faith.  So, Chea takes them on a pilgrimage to Higuey, which showed her that her husband is unfaithful to her.  Also, the father is a heavy drinker, however, he seems to be a caring, generous, and level-headed person, which I think is also an example of  questioning faith, as drinking is sacreligious, yet he seems to be one of the more stable, and well-rounded characters so far in the book.  I think that a lot more will come where characters must make the decision whether to be faithful or not, whether to themselves, or their religion.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Emotional Creature Q #1

Throughout, I am an Emotional Creature, Eve Ensler uses a number of contradictions in her writing.  I think that she creates a rhetorical environment in the readers' head to give them a sense of what the women in the monologues truly experience.  She uses this through female identities to depict scenarios that women from just about every background are faced with every day.  As a male, I think that this truly reveals how different the way women perceive things may be. The questions that women ask themselves every day, no matter what situation they are on, vary greatly from those of males, especially in today's society.  I think that the peer pressures for girls have  been heightened recently because of the feeling of body perception is stereotypically linked to a girls' popularity.  I think that there is also peer pressure between males growing up, but the extent of them is nowhere near the current, "false," expectations that girls think that they are required to fulfill.  I think the more mature women in the monologues learn to deal with these pressures more internally than the younger ones, as they realize that these "expectations," are fabricated by the social hierarchy that young women deal with today.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

question #5

Audience reaction is a major part of The Vagina Monologues, given her style of writing and topic choice.  I think that this is so crucial in this book, as well as any other piece of literature with the purpose of raising awareness, because, in order to raise somebody's awareness and truly get their attention, you must expose them to something that they are not used to seeing in a certain light.  I think she is successful in doing this, and, won't allow the reader to read the book without having a reaction to it simply because it is so easy to get a reaction from a topic that is so concealed in today's society.  Also, I think that to have any effect in society, this book must manufacture a strong reaction to have any success whatsoever.  I think that Ensler intentionally pushes the readers out of their comfort zones for the same reason.  For this book to be as gripping and raw as it is, it must be displayed in a way that is unfamiliar to its' readers.  This forces the reader to remember much more about the topic than would anything ever read in any health class or textbook, about the same topic.  Personally the monologue that resonated the most strongly with me was the one with the girl who had no vagina.  Her father took had a sort of awkward reaction, and told her that they would fix it, and that she would have a great vagina.  I think that this resonated the most strongly with me because it is a real scenario that could happen to any father, or mother, and I would not know how to handle, or perhaps even talk to my daughter about it.  I think that this monologue probably hit the closest to home for most male readers, because it is the only one, in my opinion that males can even slightly relate to. Having said that, the fact that this book was as gripping and informative as it was truly proves all of the questions asked of this post, and that Ensler's style really does have a strong affect on the reader.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Question #4

Emotion is a major part of Ensler's writing style in, The Vagina Monologues.  She uses her own emotions, as well as those of the people who she has interviewed.  She uses the term vagina, as well as its' slang terms to make the reader laugh.  She uses stories from her interviewee's pasts that females may relate to, and get a laugh out of, and males may simply laugh at.  She transitions from humor to other emotions, such as sadness or empathy by telling stories that may also be funny at first, but then portray a time in their life that effected them both physically and emotionally.  I think that she uses the humor first to let the reader get a sense of the topic, before throwing them in a very graphic and emotional situation.  I think that this may give the reader a sense of the potential embarrassment by having them find it humorous, but then realizing that this had actually happened to someone and make them feel sympathetic for their situation, hence raising the awareness for both vaginas, and violence against women.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

question #3

Ensler has two main goals throughout this book, to celebrate vaginas and to raise awareness for violence against women.  I think that she accomplishes both of these goals very well through these monologues.  I think that her goal of celebrating vaginas is accomplished simply by bringing the word "vagina" to light. Most people are afraid to say the word publicly, simply because it is seldom addressed.  Just the familiarization with the word vagina, as well as its' slang terms, that people achieve through reading this book is a step in the right direction for both of her goals.  Her asking the people she interviewed what their vaginas would wear makes the people think about something that they have probably never thought about before, and probably like to think of it, because of that reason.  Her other goal, of raising the awareness for violence against women is also accomplished through this because all the people she interviews, women from many different backgrounds, all have different answers, but ultimately are trying to accomplish the same goal; to be respected.  Also, the stories she portrays are written so simply in context, but descriptive enough in an elementary way that the reader truly sympathizes for the women who have been mutilated and/or beaten.I do not think that these two goals are contradictory of each other, because I think that you need to address vaginas in order to gain respect for women.  You must respect the woman's entire body in order for her to be respected. It addresses the fact the a vagina is not just a hole, as it seems to have a mind of its' own, and a very strong connection with its' owner.  I personally think that her goal of celebrating vaginas is accomplished more thoroughly simply because i believe that that is the predecessor for raising awareness against violence. Every part of the woman's body must be addressed.  I think that reading all of the monologues together help give the reader a sense of the word and the topic that is rarely addressed  before throwing them in dialogue that would otherwise provoke them or even offend them.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Post for 2/20- Question #2

Language is important to Ensler because she realizes the need to have freedom of speech when referring to the human body.  It is the same body part, whether called a vagina, itsy bitsy, or puki.  Ensler addresses that it seems that a lot of terms referring to the lower pelvic region of women seem to chastise it, per se, and most people do not realize the true beauty of the female genitalia.  I think that she chooses to call the genitals by their proper name, simply because that is what they are called, and that is what they should be referred to as.  In one monologue, Ensler talks about a woman who had always referred to her vagina as her, "itsy bitsy."  This name stuck with her until she was married, when she and her husband were having intercourse, and she was not able to come because she called her vagina itsy bitsy.  She was worried about this, and reluctantly called her friend to ask for advice.  Her friend did not know what she was referring to, when she said, "itsy bitsy."  When she finally figured out what she meant she said that it was called a vulva.  The woman who had referred to her vagina as "itsy bitsy" fell in love with the word, and instantly was "cured" of her "disease."  I think Ensler asks what peoples' vaginas would wear because it shows what they think of their own vagina.  Someone who would answer ripped jeans clearly does not have the same amount of self esteem about their genitals as someone who would reply with a pink boa.  I think she is trying to make people realize that their vaginas are things of beauty, and should be recognized as one.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Night Women--Sorry I couldn't find the questions!!

Night women is about a woman who is a single mother to an adolescent boy.  She has no other means of feeding him and providing shelter for him except for taking part in prostitution.  She lives in a single room apartment, and often has to carry her business in the same room as her son, and even in the same bed.  She bought her son a pair of headphones so that he can try to tune of his mothers' sins that are taking place only a few feet away from him.  His mother does not do this out of pleasure, she admits that she dreads it; it is the only way that she can provide for herself and her desperate son.  She has thought of a fabrication that she will follow, for when her son wakes up while she is in the act of serving a client.  She tells him that the angels have sent back his father for the night.  I have a problem with this because not only is it lying, it is creating a fantasy world to the son, making him believe that angels can really bring people back to life in person.  Also, I think that if the child were to be told it is his father, he would want to speak to him, and get to know the man that created him.  In the last two paragraphs, the son says to his mother, "Mommy, have I missed the angels again?"  The mother replies to him, "Darling, the angels have themselves a lifetime to come to us."  This led me to believe that his father was never actually the mother's husband, yet simply another client.  I think that this quote is the mother telling the son, inadvertently, that his father was simply another one of her clients.  On the other hand, I do not think that his mother would be a night woman if she did not have to fend for a child, unless she was not financially adequate to provide for herself.  I think that this story has a lot of possible explanations, and theories that could be interpreted completely differently in different contexts.  My thoughts are that the father was someone she saw regularly, but did not marry.  I think that he did not die, he walked out once realizing that she was pregnant.  This could also be proved on the first page of the story, when she says, "[about the father] an old lover, who disappeared with the night's shadow a long time ago."

Sunday, February 13, 2011

New York Day Women

The Story, "New York Day Women," is about a girl who from Brooklyn who sees her mother in Manhattan.  She says that she has never seen her mother in that part of the city, and decides to follow her around to see what she is up to.  There are 2 narrators in this story, the regular font being the daughter and the smaller, bold font being the mother.  Her mother seems to be a rather uptight person, so it is odd for her to be seeing her mother out of her normal environment.  The girl is very curious about her mother's journey, so much so that she knowingly stays out of work long after her lunch hour is over.  Her mother stops at numerous vendors on her way, one being a hotdog vendor who she buys a soda from, and then she stops at a dress vendor.  The girl thinks to herself that her mother should not buy the dress, because it will be donated, but her mother always insists that they will save the clothes to give to their people back in Haiti.  She then stops at another hotdog vendor, which is especially strange because she has a high cholesterol, and almost never eats anything with sodium.  She then waits for her mother to enter a park, where she sees her mother approach a woman who leaves her with her child.  The 2 of them sit near the sandbox, and she gives the little boy her soda.  Her mother is holding a conversation with other mothers who are watching other people's children.  The girl stops spying on her mother and takes a cab to return to work.  She then describes her mother in a somewhat rhetorical sense, as if it were extremely out of the ordinary to see her mother with another child.  The second to last line of the story reads, "I don't want you to be ashamed of this day woman."  I think that this is representative of a theory that her mother has always told her, that she is just beginning to understand.  I think that it means that no matter what side you may see of a woman, there may be another side of her, that you could not have imagined.  When she is by herself during the day, she may act differently than one would expect.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

nineteen thirty seven

Nineteen Thirty Seven is an extremely vivid depiction of her mothers' life in jail, and a brief description of what she had done before she was in jail.  In this story, there is only one narrator, and it is a female.  She carries around something similar to a doll, or little statue, that she calls the Madonna.  It had been owned by her family ever since her great-great-great grandmother had gotten it from a man who kept her as a slave.  It is clearly something that is very symbolic to both her and her mother, Manman.  The Madonna, "cries," when things seem to being going badly.  The girl goes to visit her mother in jail and realizes the horrible conditions that she is living in.  Her mother looks frail, with her skin barely hanging on to her body.  She buys her mother food from a vendor outside the prison, and her mother said that she would save it for months, just chewing it and putting it in her pocket, making it last longer.  Her mother, along with the other prisoners, claim to be able to fly with wings of flames.  All of these women allegedly grew wings made of flames during the Massacre in 1937, and that is why they were arrested.  Perhaps these wings are a symbol of being able to do whatever you want (fly), before the wings burn out (death).  They flew from the river that all of their mothers had passed away in.  Manman gave birth to her the same day as the massacre, and said that her daughter replaced her own mother.  I found this story very hard to follow, but the descriptiveness made it readable.  It also leads me to wonder who the girl is, and if she has any relation to the prior story.

Fundamentalism

I chose this poem because I think that it relates to a lot of things that people my age are experiencing, along with relating to what she has experienced from her culture.  I think that the format of the first half of the poem, where she asks a number of questions is a rhetorical way to self-examine one's self.  I think that they are questions that she has asked herself throughout the course of her life.  I think that she is trying to express the point that it is more important to be true to one's self, rather than worrying about satisfying others.  I think that she proves this in the stanza that states, "If you liked the kind on his golden throne more than the villagers carrying the baskets of lemons?".  This means that she believes that it is more important to work hard for yourself than to fall into a lifestyle of social hierarchy.  This idea is also carried over into the next stanza, where she states, "If you wanted to be sure his guards would admit you to the party?".  This once again displays her thoughts about her meaning of life, and that it is vital to keep your morals, and know where you came from.  That the only one who needs to be satisfied is the Gods that you believe in, and know that they will never be truly satisfied, so one's mission in life needs to be to do all they can to achieve the closest thing to it.  The last two stanzas, for me, are difficult to interpret.  She seems to imply that she knows someone whose father is in a war, and she does not want them to follow his father's footsteps. I think that the correlation between the final stanza and the boy sharpen his broken pencil with a knife shows that he has mad a mistake in his life, and thinks that it is not repairable.  The pencil tip is repairable however, and I think that is what Nye is trying to personify when she says in the last stanza, "If he would believe his life is like that."

Monday, February 7, 2011

Two Countries

I chose this poem because I think that she subliminally displays the hardships she has had to face throughout the course of her life. I think the analogy of skin is meant to depict herself, because she believes that people don't look past her skin, and get to know her, besides the fact that she is middle eastern.  The poem also analogizes a feather, which i think represents her culture that her family had followed so strongly in the middle east. I think that the feather falling off of the bird represents that when she came to America, her culture had been "plucked" away from her, and that she had no choice but to let it remain in the middle east, for the most part.  I think that when she states that the feather had been, "swept away by someone who never saw it was a feather," is her way of saying that most people do not take the time to learn about her culture before sweeping it away into a pile of prejudice.  I think that this poem is a good generalization of her thoughts on living in America, and the people she has encountered on her journey.  Toward the end of the poem, she says that "Even when skin is not alone, it remembers being alone and thanks something larger, that there are travelers, that people go places larger than themseleves."  I believe that this is her embracing other people who have been foreigners in a country to promote the well being of foreigners, and for the inhabitants to embrace them and get to know them

Sunday, January 30, 2011

poem

Welcome Me, Adulthood

Welcome me, Adulthood, I have ventured
through childhood with all the wonders and dangers in it.

I have placed my childhood fantasies aside,
and picked up hopes of becoming who I want to be.

Embrace me knowledge,
I am ready to know more and add to what I know already.
I have conquered my fear of the night,
now I only fear of becoming nothing.
I have stopped pretending to be what I thought I was going to be,
and realized that I am only what I make of myself.

I have come down from the land of make-believe,
and I have found the strength to believe in me.
So when I come upon you, open your arms,
and welcome me, Adulthood,
for I am headed your way.


I chose this poem because it relates to my life at this very moment.  Many college students can probably relate, as they move from childhood into the real world, and have to let go of many old habits, and use what they know to create new ones.